Du pont:
if I intend to have this, then
knowing the person LONG ENOUGH. [Du didn't know her at all]
having LONGER TIME TO RETAIN victim [no way at all for 3 seconds]
how this attracting kid entering the house and harassing theory fail?
a I enter my house first. She stayed outside the entrance first for a while.
then I entered secondly and get the items from the table.
she then entered into the property.
[Du did not go to unlock the door but THE WIND DOES]
Knocking come. Then I go and open the door.
This is not at all any trap for Du to enter and unlock the door.
[This is nothing about Du enter the property and lock the door and I harass the victim afterward. The door is not closed by Du at all. Boyfriend and Mother are outside looking]
WHAT CONDITIONS EXIST if one want to touch someone?
time == for Du time is too short, people are around, father is there.
someone who know is familar == Du doesn't know her at all.
able to talk == Du can't talk to her at all cos Du doesn't speak English well
environment should be comfortable for Du = Du has wife and son around.
substantial evidence is not DOUBTLESSLY existing = benefit of doubt go to Du
if police keep repeatedly asking "did he"/ "has he" ? = can kids admit that how many times is being touched? can kid answer that whether Du is intentionally touched her?
if I intend to have this, then
knowing the person LONG ENOUGH. [Du didn't know her at all]
having LONGER TIME TO RETAIN victim [no way at all for 3 seconds]
how this attracting kid entering the house and harassing theory fail?
a I enter my house first. She stayed outside the entrance first for a while.
then I entered secondly and get the items from the table.
she then entered into the property.
[Du did not go to unlock the door but THE WIND DOES]
Knocking come. Then I go and open the door.
This is not at all any trap for Du to enter and unlock the door.
[This is nothing about Du enter the property and lock the door and I harass the victim afterward. The door is not closed by Du at all. Boyfriend and Mother are outside looking]
WHAT CONDITIONS EXIST if one want to touch someone?
time == for Du time is too short, people are around, father is there.
someone who know is familar == Du doesn't know her at all.
able to talk == Du can't talk to her at all cos Du doesn't speak English well
environment should be comfortable for Du = Du has wife and son around.
substantial evidence is not DOUBTLESSLY existing = benefit of doubt go to Du
if police keep repeatedly asking "did he"/ "has he" ? = can kids admit that how many times is being touched? can kid answer that whether Du is intentionally touched her?
RETAINED COUNSEL ?? ALL CLIENT PAID!!
RETAINED COUNSEL
Please tell Mr. Du that the court cannot provide him with a free interpreter, because he now has retained counsel (a lawyer he has hired). He must now pay for all costs (for interpreters, experts, investigators, etc.). 09/01/2010 at 11pm to say NO ON COURT FOR 09/02/2010 == Whao.. Francis: An emergency has come up and I cannot be in court tomorrow morning. Another attorney, Richard Tamor, will appear for me with Mr. Du. I have instructed Richard on what exactly needs to happen. Please communicate this to Mr. Du and tell him I'm sorry I can't be in court tomorrow. We will connect very soon. Thanks. Edwin LAW OFFICES OF EDWIN PRATHER 461 Bush Street, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94108 - Tel: 415.881.7774 - edwin@pratherlawoffices.com  |
12/2/10 Thurs
|
Point to ponder:
|
the following are youtubesDonorDu gift Tea to DoneeSteve http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceKVk8jfk_4 DonorDu gift Pasta to DoneeSteve http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kf1mnbVdrx0 Height and Distance depicts Discrepancy on Police Report http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urtmVQfV6rY Community work Evidence Proof volunteering Hours http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xL8Mg37XbN4 |
draftting on 09-01-2010
|
Sent on 08-30-2010 Monday after Du wife told me
| ||||||||
Wording Useful:
1. served to focus media attention on various old allegations of marital infidelity 2.Amid all of the media attention paid to investigation and hearings, allegations by a young woman from Castro Valley went nearly unnoticed at first. 3.attempted to undermine her credibility through repeated denials 4.That ruling was unanimously upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court which stated that the case was "highly unlikely to occupy any substantial amount'' of the President's time. 5.openly flirted with him 6.under the pretext of determining whether Jordan and Clinton had encouraged Lewinsky to lie. |
DEFENSE: 1. also said he could not recall ever being alone with her i 2.DU , somber and hesitant, denied under oath having sexual relations with 3."I believe that the allegations are completely untrue," 4.Standing alongside First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton and Vice President Al Gore in the Roosevelt Room of the White House, Clinton waged his finger at news cameras and declared: "But I want to say one thing to the American people. I want you to listen to me. I'm going to say this again: I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky. I never told anybody to lie, not a single time -- never. These allegations are false. And I need to go back to work for the American people." |
Information about wording;
1. although _______'s alleged behavior in the hotel room may have been "boorish and offensive," it did not meet the standard of sexual harassment under federal law. 2.was questioned at length regarding the information Lewinsky had provided, but repeatedly declined to answer specific questions concerning sex. 3.asserting that the charges against Clinton did not rise to the level of "high Crimes and Misdemeanors" mentioned, but not specifically defined, in the U.S. Constitution as grounds for impeachment, and therefore did not warrant removal of the 4.They hoped for a congressional censure of the President that would reprimand him but leave him in office |
Strong closing statement
1. was an attempt to avoid the 2.The Du's case ends as it began, an unsubstantiated, circumstantial case that does not meet the standard 3.proposed that the impeachment case against ___ be dismissed outright for lack of merit. 4.pact of cooperation fell apart 5."There is only one question before you, albeit a difficult one, one that is a question of fact and law and constitutional theory. Would it put at risk the liberties of the people to retain the President in office? Putting aside partisan animus, if you can honestly say that it would not, that those liberties are safe in his hands, then you must vote to acquit." 6."A failure to convict will make the statement that lying under oath, while unpleasant and to be avoided, is not all that serious...We have reduced lying under oath to a breach of etiquette, but only if you are the President...And now let us all take our place in history on the side of honor, and, oh, yes, let right be done." |
|
After reviewing the information about Mr. Du's case and giving the matter much thought,
I have come to the conclusion that it is best for me to decline the case. In part this is because I am uncomfortable with the fact that Mr. Du was not candid with me in telling me that the entire case was about one minor incident with one child, when in fact he is charged in two incidents with two different girls, and also has had a civil proceeding involving still another child. Also, it turns out that Mr. Du is charged only with misdemeanor offenses. In my practice I generally do not handle misdemeanor cases, because I would have to charge far more in fees than such a case is worth, and I do not wish to do that. When I quoted my fee to Mr. Du, it was with the understanding that he is charged with a felony. That fee would be too high for a misdemeanor, but I am not able to handle a matter in Solano County for a lower fee. I know that the family will be disappointed, but I believe this is the correct decision. Thanks for your help. |
Important Files:
| ||||||||||
Never sent to Edwin 09/01/2010
|
ask legal terms to enrich wording1. what is 莫需有 2 how to use one term to describe prosecutor's greed or prosecutor irrational exaggeration on the bail request to judge $70,000 at first [dropped to $7,000 finally] 3 4 |
