Blog Archives

Denial reason in court: Defer to work que

9/23/2017

D is up because

1, bureaucratic burden did found everywhere without change and so Clinton (in politics so many years but somte are not changed) arguent works;

2, Christianity back up either blindly because of whitism or traditional perception on LBYN or mariJ issues;

3, AI is happening in 2017, Facebook stopped AI self deducing language creation;

4, TAPP out, Environmental treaty out, Mexican wall suggestion == mainstream for partially reason and part of the people;

5 outspoken "fake media" theory awaken normal reader of media.

Donald is a proof of something deeper in America

9/23/2017

Why Donald can do so many things without problem, But other similar people can not?

1, He can laugh at female without consequence;

2, He can humiliate UN without impreached;

3, He can file bankrupcy twice and third meaning he can have $ after the 1st bankcrupcy;

4, He deliver promise to donate $million but unperform without lawsuit or without followup or any consequence;

5, His regim can hold vacancy position long so as to show these positions are redundant on the other angle;

6, "u r fired" FBI (some may think it is right, too) without problem

Conclusion:

He know what he can do. He know what he did and people wont be able to lawsuit him ? or bring him down? or fire him?

If really so, then no doubt that he is smart.

How to defend as insurance payor?

9/8/2017

Glen JOhn Yep, owner of Tai Shan cafe:

1, no anymore Tai Shan cafe. It was sold;

2, FArmer insurance deal with it and so why plaintiff did not sue Farmer instead;

3, personally I should not be responsible so $1500 is too much;

*

Prepare to state why $300 is not much for preparing doc. Preparing doc including research owner name, going to county recorder to print the paper after the assessor office, serving twice both in SF and Oakland, several hours of meeting clients and presenting the case in court today as an interpreter

plaintiff: If $1000 is taken, then Farmer may allocate more payment and switch to me because farmer will say that plaintiff now collect $ from the case?

mediator: This is between plaintiff and farmer. This case is only plaintiff and defendant. Farmer do not have respresentative here. Will defendant pay more $ for that (it is not fair for defendant to speculate this future happening either)? Up to defendant to decide paying more $$ for that. Of course, if Farmer ask you more, then you bring Farmer to court.