1, Puzzled why Big company request jury instead of bench since it takes more costs and more time consuming? Answer: Big company 's att said he tried to eliminate the presiding judge away from doubt of conspiracy because senior individual plaintiff is using conspiracy judge-big company as a criticism! (No need to prove la!)




2, When plaintiff present twice the letter of threat to defendant's attorney, claiming defendant is demanding $5000 even case is filed via insurance; HOW attorney creatively answer? Answer: small claim paper work force the claimant to send letter first asking $ and defendant did intend to file small claim to sue Plaintiff! (cause and action is reversedly manipulated by words from creative att so that defendant seems innocently filed but HOW HURT IT CAN BE?!)

In your own words,
tell the court why you want to expunge your conviction. Consider including information like:
 Your plans for the future;
 The reasons you offended, and how your life is different today than it was when you offended;
 How the conviction has hurt your employment chances;
 If you have received any training or education since your conviction;
 Any occurrence in your life that changed how you interact with your community; and
 An y 12-step or religious affiliations you have.

reference:
http://www.saclaw.lib.ca.us/Uploads/files/Step-by-Step/ExpungingCriminalRecords.pdf

http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/cr180.pdf

http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/cr181.pdf

http://courts.ca.gov/documents/mc030.pdf



 

1, hayward court brenda will accept my fax for requesting projector for bao

Apologising

Many lawsuits arise or continue because a wrongdoer has not apologised to the party who was wronged. The Apology Act, SBC 2006, c 19 allows a person to apologise for a wrongful act or failure to act without the apology becoming an admission of liability. A sincere apology can often avert litigation or form an important foundation for a settlement.

http://www.lslap.bc.ca/UserFiles/2012/20_SmallClaims_12.pdf

1, Attorney get 66% this time
2, Insurance only offer $7000 but attorney felt too little for the 2 years working
3, patient was work compensated later and so don't want to be affected by wrongly profiled as fraudulent in work comp case
4, patient is mad at arrogance of attorney
LESSON: BIG PROFITOR PERCENTAGE will expect MORE, less easy to give up or quit WHILE small percent receipent will give up

1, First handyman attempt to see if the lighter works?
ANSWER: NO BECAUSE Starter broken. Is that gas pressure? Is that handyman not thorough enough?
LESSON: DO EVERYTHING THOROUGH ENOUGH to make sure so as to eliminate unnecessary VITAL TO BUSINESS.

2, Second handyman suggest to buy boiler but why BIG BOILER 40 GALLON ($498) if too many occupants instead of less price 38 gallon costing only $408?
ANSWER: BIG gallon, better result for occupant but owner worry the permit issue.(handyman will not consider himself or just underestimate!) water consumption will be higher!

3, Third without successfully start the starter after installed, even late evening, HOW CAN U ASK $150 ?
ANSWER: IF this is your house, then will u handyman take the job as completed? next day I went there and call the technician and I MADE IT START with Bao. Shifting to B after pressing both starter and keep pressing only 20 times (MAGIC BUT HEED THAT people use 20 as a unique tracing number for information flow from faked unsuccessful handy to whoever?)

4, Finally, faucet $30? job cost $50? 2 days are gone! handyman lache.

Three types of people will say these.
1 staff of the city / county/ state / court who KNOW but decide NOT to answer or FORCED not to answer how so as to minimize litigation/ minimize city's liablity
2, lawyer / counsel who ASK FOR ADDITIONAL $ after taking your case or maybe before taking your case
3, others but what is the intent?

what is ex parte?
http://www.saccourt.ca.gov/forms/docs/cv-185.pdf

http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/subp002.pdf

http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/dv110.pdf

clerk should do all typing work
http://www.justia.com/trials-litigation/docs/caci/200/211.html

 

214. Admissions by Silence

 

PROPOSED BY:

PLAINTIFF

GIVEN AS PROPOSED

___________________

GIVEN AS MODIFIED

___________________

GIVEN ON COURT’S OWN MOTION

___________________

REFUSED

___________________

WITHDRAWN

___________________