Generally, Property tax is approx 1.25% of your purchase price, but it can defer in different counties.
Click on the link below for Alameda County Tax calculator, trust this will help. Yes property taxes can go up due to any parcel taxes or measures passed within the City or County. Trust this helps.

http://www.co.alameda.ca.us/prop_tax_info_app/index.jsp
==Honestly, that tax rate isn't true - it is almost 2% in Berkeley.
The 1% annual for my property is $3321. Voter added cost add 821.06 for Schools, Mello Roos, Buses and Parks = 4142.56. But they never tell you about the non-voter approved taxes $1577.26 = GRAND TOTAL of $5919.82.

So in the real world, its double. Berkeley tax = 2%.
6 grand is a lil higher than 3 grand and it is closer to 2% than 1%.

1, not late, then we learn to listen

2, not late mean we obey rule

3, not late mean respect to god on Sunday if we do whether u agree or u disagree

4, parable says the door for the wedding party is open but some women are not prepared and LATE, so no more allow entry

but is that 10% to church is under anticipation ?

I personally feel NO.

simply 24 hours x 7 days of time is give to u but will u given 2.4 hours x 7 back (according to 10%)

or even 2.4 hours per week? if not, then can donation be substituted by hours? if not, then why giving you living right of 24 hours x 7 then if u r saying solely business without the relationship of father and son!

F FINANCE - Exodus?! 8:18 God give us right to EARN

I interest to  - Jennifer bring Lam, Philip bring me and I bring Du and Chan, Du bring his wife, Helen bring Herbert and Janet bring relative - if Pastor is interested in coming to church, she feel excited before she come

R Relate - father and son relationship feeling yet?

S Schedule - task is to priority first for God. For me, I rest and so I have less risk of unhealthy. Tuesday I have less risk of spending $ out. Friday I have work on my spirit.

T Trouble Time - Brandon don't come before Stroke but now even Sunday he can earn, then he still give up and come to Church. Lot of worker quit working on Sundays instead. Du drive all way from Richmond to here. Lower the risk of trouble time is the benefit.

Huang said to comfortable mode of Answer by admitting himself going to church. The key point is a, only Christ die FOR u, none of the others so Good for me. b, lot of books written before n after to target same Christ But NOT others.  c,lot of time years to test n challenge Christ in studies, exam, DNA, light, moon arriving,  message inside light by 6 parameters,  dark energy more than light itself, anti matter...

motorized? science shorten lot But human added more to counter For specific reason!  blood vessels hardened as aging But bone get fragile in counter. Why?

1, $8550 is what?
2, next step is time
3, slow and info is vital
4, dropping christina zumudio is a signal
5, enforcement is automatically postponed until Nov 10

遺憾的是，現實的公理往往並不分明，法官逐漸演變為「御用」工具，失去本身的獨立性。最典型的例子便是歐記健保法2012年3月27日，以一票之差「勝出」，但全國36 州（多為共和黨州長執政）拒絕「跟進」，迫使聯邦政府為他們設立健保交易所，透過國稅局實施「健保抵稅」，由此引發了36州「保民」的多起訴訟，控告國稅局在未設立州健保交易所的36州實施健保抵稅「違憲」，予以「封殺」。2014年7月22日華府聯邦地方法院對由2名小企業主提出的國稅局代行健保抵稅「違憲」訴訟作出判決，判定國稅局敗訴。兩個小時之後，維州地方法院對國稅局「越權」代理健保抵稅訴訟作出相反的判決，判定國稅局勝訴，國稅局有權在未設立健保交易所的36州代理州府職權，並不「違憲」。繼華府哥倫比亞特區和維吉尼亞州之後，印第安納南區法院法官William T. Lawrence（2002年由喬治布什任命）於2014年8月13日再次「封殺」國稅局在印第安納州代行健保抵稅，判定國稅局「違憲」敗訴。

業界普遍認為36州的健保抵稅訴訟案最後會上訴到聯邦最高法院，屆時，2014年參眾兩院的期中選舉，乃至2016年的總統大選，將共同決定36州健保抵稅合法還是「違憲」的命運。

大法官再挺小業主 

solicitation is illegal and can be arrested too....

key is yes:
1, supply information useful and he will argue according to his series of logical thought with legal knowhow, legal risk and consequence
2, prepare for unexpected yet? if so, then no accidental outcome backslapping client , scoring principle backward so as to maintain good relationship or to continue like Franklin who fail to argue and use opposite stories to conceal and wash out the impact at all
3, style is not debative? so what! but in fact, it affect the result because opposing counsel will test and ask the same question regarding your respresentation and so if opposing counsel further control the talk, drill the opposing thought and idea into judge presumption and ruling;
1, Summer loss will happen again! Too bad;
2, STeve Kadsin Ruling will happen again! Two years afterward are non balancing the impact of any remedy at all!
3, Criminal Case is even worst to fight back once defendant admitted any wrongdoing or so!

BACK NOW:
WHAT happen if counsel is expected and WILL NOT fight openly FOR principles?
1, will client voice out by himself without interference or without disturbance from all sides ?
2, will it be heard really in court?
3, will it work?
4, how much afterward ?