1, supply information useful and he will argue according to his series of logical thought with legal knowhow, legal risk and consequence
2, prepare for unexpected yet? if so, then no accidental outcome backslapping client , scoring principle backward so as to maintain good relationship or to continue like Franklin who fail to argue and use opposite stories to conceal and wash out the impact at all
3, style is not debative? so what! but in fact, it affect the result because opposing counsel will test and ask the same question regarding your respresentation and so if opposing counsel further control the talk, drill the opposing thought and idea into judge presumption and ruling;
1, Summer loss will happen again! Too bad;
2, STeve Kadsin Ruling will happen again! Two years afterward are non balancing the impact of any remedy at all!
3, Criminal Case is even worst to fight back once defendant admitted any wrongdoing or so!
WHAT happen if counsel is expected and WILL NOT fight openly FOR principles?
1, will client voice out by himself without interference or without disturbance from all sides ?
2, will it be heard really in court?
3, will it work?
4, how much afterward ?