1, Ex-client using other intepreter can score faithful interpreter that :" Interpreter should explain the proceeding and process of the court to client" (ex-client can pose any comment afterward because no need to use interpreter as critical as it used to be)
2, "if you feel that I need to object, then make sure you signal me" (impartial prohibit side talk and signaling and why impartial interpreter risk by doing unnecessary gesture affecting judge and proeeding since later client can deny and intepreter has no "ESTOPPEL")
3, Client jump to the stand. Interpeter keep seated at the back. Luckily client's son signalled to come up. In realty, will interpreter fail when interpreter is not authorized by the court to be have a STANDING? Simply
BENEFICIAL CREDIT TO INTEPRETER:
1, IF interpreter failed to initiatively simultaneously work cooperatively to client, then "where is the paper!" will not be responded and the rest of the story
2, If Thursday is not printed out the paper, no submissal (why Q score without thinking the consequence!? the consequence is NO MORE RESPRESENTATION)
2, "if you feel that I need to object, then make sure you signal me" (impartial prohibit side talk and signaling and why impartial interpreter risk by doing unnecessary gesture affecting judge and proeeding since later client can deny and intepreter has no "ESTOPPEL")
3, Client jump to the stand. Interpeter keep seated at the back. Luckily client's son signalled to come up. In realty, will interpreter fail when interpreter is not authorized by the court to be have a STANDING? Simply
BENEFICIAL CREDIT TO INTEPRETER:
1, IF interpreter failed to initiatively simultaneously work cooperatively to client, then "where is the paper!" will not be responded and the rest of the story
2, If Thursday is not printed out the paper, no submissal (why Q score without thinking the consequence!? the consequence is NO MORE RESPRESENTATION)
RSS Feed
